Wednesday, November 14, 2012

Kids who eat out eat more in a day



Kids and calories: Take a kid to a restaurant or serve him take-out food and chances are that child will end up eating more calories that day than on a day with only home-cooked meals, a new study confirms. The findings may not be surprising, but parents may find some of the details eye-opening. For example, kids ages 2 to 11 got more excess calories from sit-down restaurants than fast food places. And meals from either type of establishment cut the day's milk consumption while raising soda intake.(Reuters)

Smoking at the hospital: Quitting smoking is hard. Latest evidence: Nearly one in five hospitalized smokers kept smoking during their stay at one Massachusetts hospital, despite getting onsite smoking cessation counseling and despite the fact that smoking was only allowed in outdoor shelters. (HealthDay)

Meningitis update: Thirty people have now died in a fungal meningitis outbreak linked to tainted steroid injections, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention said Monday. The case count is at 419 and includes ten joint infections. (Associated Press)

Today's talker: Guys, here's a quick test to take in the shower: Look down. If you can't see your own genitals, it may be time to admit you have a weight problem. That's the concept behind a new campaign in England called The Big Check. Researchers there say about one third of guys in a recent study failed the test. It might be a good way to get U.S. men to focus on their weight, too, one doctor tells NBC News: "While it may be a crude judging tool, it's certainly not a bad eyeball test."

Even fit aging people won't escape heart problems



CHICAGO -- Here's a reality check for health-conscious baby boomers: Even among those in good shape, at least 1 in 3 will eventually develop heart problems or have a stroke.

The upside is that that will happen about seven years later than for their less healthy peers.
The findings come in an analysis of five major studies involving nearly 50,000 adults aged 45 and older who were followed for up to 50 years.

The best odds are in the healthiest adults – those who don't smoke, have diabetes, high blood pressure or high cholesterol. Still, among 55-year-olds in that category, about a third can expect to develop heart or other cardiovascular problems as they age.

Dr. Vincent Bufalino, a Chicago area cardiologist and spokesman for the American Heart Association, said the study is "a wake-up call that this disease is very prevalent in the United States and even if you're doing a good job, you're not immune."

The researchers estimated risks older people face for developing these ailments in their lifetime, or by their 80s or 90s. They also estimated how many years they'll live free of heart disease and related problems, depending on the most common risk factors.

Pooling follow-up data from the five analyzed studies, the researchers found that the healthiest 45-year-olds lived up to 14 years longer free of heart ailments than those with at least two risk factors. The healthiest 55-year-olds lived up to about seven years longer than their less healthy peers.

The study was published online Monday in the Journal of the American Medical Association and released in connection with the American Heart Association conference meeting in Los Angeles. The National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute paid for the research.

The authors estimated higher lifetime risks than previous studies, but their analysis involved a broader range of ailments, including heart failure and strokes.

While prevalence of heart disease and related deaths have declined nationwide in recent years, more than 82 million Americans – roughly one-third – have some form of cardiovascular disease, according to the American Heart Association.

Most people in the analysis had high blood pressure or at least one of the other risk factors.

The results shouldn't be discouraging, said lead author Dr. John Wilkins, an assistant professor of preventive medicine and cardiology at Northwestern University's medical school in Chicago. Maintaining an optimal lifestyle, by eating sensibly and staying active, is still the best way to live a long, healthy life, he said.

Heart disease remains the nation's leading cause of death, and the study reinforces the idea that "cardiovascular disease is part of the aging process," said Cleveland Clinic heart specialist Dr. David Frid, who was not involved in the research. Bodies wear out, "and ultimately, just exposure to living is going to cause people to develop some of these underlying problems," Frid said.

Redheads' genes add to melanoma risk


Redheads have long been known to be at a higher risk for melanoma, the deadliest type of skin cancer, because their fair and sometimes freckly skin provides less natural protection against UV radiation from the sun - or so doctors had thought.

New research shows that genetic factors of the skin pigment that's predominantly found in redheads may be what's to blame for the increased melanoma risk.

Melanoma is the leading cause of death from skin disease, with more than 76,000 cases expected to be diagnosed in 2012 in addition to nearly 9,200 deaths caused by the cancer.

Fisher's study is published in the Oct 31 issue of Nature.

Human skin contains different types of the pigment melanin, a natural substance that gives the skin its color.

There's a dark brown/black form called eumelanin which is predominantly found in those with dark hair or skin, and also a lighter red/blond pigment called pheomelanin, which is the predominant pigment in individuals with red hair, freckles and fair skin.

According to the researchers, skin type alone can't explain the rise in melanoma risk among redheads because this increased risk has also seen been seen in skin areas not directly exposed to sun. They tested that theory on two strains of mice that were genetically identical, except one group was bred to have a gene that would give mice more dark-colored pigment and the other group was bred to possess the pigment-producing gene that causes red hair and fair skin in humans.

The researchers used a method to activate a melanoma-causing gene that typically requires UV radiation to create melanoma cancer cells in a lab setting. However, they were surprised to find half of the red mice had developed melanoma within months without UV exposure, compared with only a few dark mice.

Next the researchers wanted to see whether the red pigment itself may cause cancer, testing it on a group of "albino redheads," which were fair-skinned mice who had their pigment production genetically disabled. They found that by completely removing the so-called "red-pigment pathway," the mice were completely protected against melanoma.

The researchers say melanoma risk for redheads might instead be caused by "oxidative damage," from molecules called reactive oxygen species (ROS) which damage cells' DNA. The researchers found higher levels of DNA damage caused by ROS in the skin of red mice, but not in the albino redhead mice.

"Right now we're excited to have a new clue to help better understand this mystery behind melanoma, which we have always hoped could be a preventable disease," Fisher said. "The risk for people with this skin type has not changed, but now we know that blocking UV radiation - which continues to be essential - may not be enough."

Since sunscreen may not offer full protection, the researchers recommend that redheads be especially vigilant looking for changes in their skin, and to never hesitate to get checked out by a dermatologist.

"The big danger here is that somebody will say, 'Oh, well if I can't do anything about it, then I can go to a suntanning salon and go tanning on the beach and just call it fate.' That's not the case," Dr. Meenhard Herlyn, director of the Wistar Institute Melanoma Research Center in Philadelphia, told The Los Angeles Times. "One still has to be very conscientious about not getting a sunburn and getting the damage."

Eugene Healy, a clinical dermatologist at the University of Southampton, U.K., however downplayed the findings to Nature News. He said while the mechanism reported in the study is interesting, it is probably a less common melanoma trigger than UV radiation. "You almost never see melanoma, for example, on the buttocks," said Healy.